<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Designer III Blog, cap and trade</title>
<description>cap and trade, Designer III Blog most recent posts</description>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<link>http://blog.designer-iii.com/cap_and_trade</link>
<language>en</language>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
<ttl>200</ttl>

<item>
<title>Flawed argument against plug-in electric vehicles (cap and trade)</title>
<description>Posted by Bob Paddock: (cap and trade) The US House passed last night (June/26/2009) the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 , in a close [404 Check: was link to http:/ / www. google. com/ trends/ hottrends q=cap and trade vote results and amp;date=2009 -6 -27 and amp;sa=X, anchor: vote] . You can read H.R.2454 here . Section 121 covers the electric vehicle infrastructure. &lt;br&gt;Tags: &lt;b&gt;cap and trade&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;b&gt;carbon capture sequestration&lt;/b&gt;. Comments: 0.</description>
<link>http://blog.designer-iii.com/cap_and_trade/20090627-120252-Flawed-argument-against-plug-in-electric-vehicles</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designer-iii.com/cap_and_trade/20090627-120252-Flawed-argument-against-plug-in-electric-vehicles</guid>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
