<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Designer III Blog, round to nearest integer</title>
<description>round to nearest integer, Designer III Blog most recent posts</description>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<link>http://blog.designer-iii.com/round_to_nearest_integer</link>
<language>en</language>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
<ttl>200</ttl>

<item>
<title>Why is my AVR baud rate wrong (round to nearest integer)</title>
<description>Posted by Bob Paddock: (round to nearest integer) Recent AVR-LibC FAQ submission of mine: Why is my AVR baud rate wrong Some AVR datasheets give the following formula for calculating baud rates: (F_CPU/(UART_BAUD_RATE 16L)-1) Unfortunately that formula does not work with all combinations of clock speeds and baud rates due to integer truncation during the division operator. When doing&lt;br&gt;Tags: &lt;b&gt;avr baud rate&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;b&gt;interger truncation&lt;/b&gt;. Comments: 0.</description>
<link>http://blog.designer-iii.com/avr_baud_rate/20090111-201356-Why-is-my-AVR-baud-rate-wrong</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designer-iii.com/avr_baud_rate/20090111-201356-Why-is-my-AVR-baud-rate-wrong</guid>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>

